Palms
Palms
| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to <strong>smudgepainter</strong>.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>! |
|
Moderator: Gale
MurryG wrote:Talk about saving a so-so photo! What a nice upgrade you've accomplished here!!
Murry
bross wrote:MurryG wrote:Talk about saving a so-so photo! What a nice upgrade you've accomplished here!!
Murry
OK, now let's be completely honest here. After all that is how we learn the most, right? This is not a so-so photo. This is a completely TERRIBLE photo in every sense: out of focus, "devil eyes" (animal version of red eye), poor lighting, etc. They don't get much worse. So with such a bad starting point, yes, this was a valiant effort at rescuing something in the painting process. Hopefully, however this will serve as a prime example of one of the most important rules to remember in photo painting: The better the photo to use as a starting point, the better the end result (painting/smudge) will be. There is no such thing as "fixing" a terrible photo in Photoshop or any other program. A terrible photo can be repaired with careful and tedious work to make it an OK photo, however when starting with a beautiful photo one can crate a truly magnificent work of art through the wonders of painting. The old saying "Garbage in, garbage out" applies to most things in life, photo post processing included.
That said, again it was quite a rescue attempt on the part of the OP. Lots of hard work to get it this far, I'm sure. Just think what you could have done with a good photo!
(Stepping off my soapbox now)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests